Both candidates for HD 2 support legalizing marijuana
Although many issues separate the Democrat and Republican candidates running for State House District 2, the contenders agree on one thing Ń marijuana should be legal for adults.
Having Rep. Mark Ferrandino, D-Denver, and Doc Miller, his Republican opponent in the upcoming election, both publicly support the decriminalization of marijuana has some activists giddy about the changes in public opinion towards the drug.
“I think it’s a good sign that marijuana reform is becoming a widely accepted position,” said Mason Tvert of Safer Alternative For Enjoyable Recreation (SAFER), a group that points out the ways they perceive marijuana to be less harmful than alcohol. “We see Democrats and Republicans not only both voicing public support for reforming marijuana laws, but in some sense often vying to see who can support them more.”
Ferrandino, a member of the Joint Budget Committee, said legalizing
marijuana would help the state’s pocketbook, which is facing an
additional $75 million shortfall next budget year and a potential $1
billion shortfall the following year. 9News reported this week that the
city of Denver collected more than $1 million in sales tax revenue from
medical marijuana from December-April.
“If you legalize it and you tax it, you’re going to increase the amount
of revenue to the state,” Ferrandino said. Miller, a lawyer challenging
Ferrandino for his House District 2 seat, added that legalizing
marijuana would result in fewer people in jail, less money spent by the
state, and allow him as an attorney to “stop fishing them out one at a
time.”
“My solution to the drug war is to do like we did with prohibition when
we realized that didn’t work and legalize marijuana,” he said.
A regulated environment
Although he supports the legalization of marijuana, Ferrandino said the
industry would have to be regulated in order to avoid a “wild, wild
West” type of environment. He believes the biggest hurdle to
legalization is making sure that police officers could definitively tell
whether someone was driving under the influence of marijuana.
Denver Police officers are trained to recognize when someone is driving
and under the influence of drugs. Officers can also call over a “Drug
Recognition Expert” police officer to conduct tests and further identify
the signs of someone driving under the influence of drugs.
However, police officers don’t have a device like a Breathalyzer that
can determine on scene whether someone is definitively on drugs. DPD
Spokesman Sonny Jackson said that the police department isn’t made up of
scientists or inventors who could invent such a device, so they must
rely on their training.
Jeremy Rosenthal, an attorney who specializes in DUI cases, said it’s
very tough for cops and the state to prove in court that a person was
driving under the influence of drugs because there is no near-foolproof
test like a Breathalyzer.
“They usually only win those cases when the cop actually sees the person
smoking,” he said.
Rosenthal added that he has seen more clients who are charged with
driving under the influence of drugs since the proliferation of medical
marijuana dispensaries. Because the Denver Police Department doesn’t
have a separate ticket for driving under the influence of marijuana,
it’s impossible to say how many people have been arrested or cited for
it, Jackson said.
Public support
Ferrandino believes the path to marijuana legalization must go through
the voters. Tvert, who originally considered putting an initiative on
this year’s ballot asking voters to legalize marijuana, will likely wait
until 2012 to bring the measure forward because of funding issues.
However, recent polling shows that nearly half of Coloradans support the
legalization of marijuana, and as U.S. Rep. Jared Polis, D-Colo., said
earlier this year, having multiple lawmakers publicly talk about
legalizing marijuana would have been unheard of only 10 years ago.
“The time for debate and discussion has definitely come,” said
Ferrandino. |